Alpha vs. Beta Testing

In the past we’ve witnessed some confusion regarding the key differences between the Alpha Test and Beta Test phases of product development. While there are no hard and fast rules, and many companies have their own definitions and unique processes, the information in the table below is a good general overview:

Note! If you’re interested in the differences between alpha and beta testing, you might also be interested in downloading our free whitepaper, on Getting Ready for Beta Testing.

Alpha Test Beta Test
What they do
Improve the quality of the product and ensure beta readiness. Improve the quality of the product, integrate customer input on the complete product, and ensure release readiness.
When they happen
Toward the end of a development process when the product is in a near fully-usable state. Just prior to launch, sometimes ending within weeks or even days of final release.
How long they last
Usually very long and see many iterations. It’s not uncommon for alpha to last 3-5x the length of beta. Usually only a few weeks (sometimes up to a couple of months) with few major iterations.
Who cares about it
Almost exclusively quality/engineering (bugs, bugs, bugs). Usually involves product marketing, support, docs, quality and engineering (basically the entire product team).
Who participates (tests)
Normally performed by test engineers, employees, and sometimes “friends and family”. Focuses on testing that would emulate ~80% of the customers. Tested in the “real world” with “real customers” and the feedback can cover every element of the product.
What testers should expect
Plenty of bugs, crashes, missing docs and features. Some bugs, fewer crashes, most docs, feature complete.
How they’re addressed
Most known critical issues are fixed, some features may change or be added as a result of early feedback. Much of the feedback collected is considered for and/or implemented in future versions of the product. Only important/critical changes are made.
What they achieve
About methodology, efficiency and regiment. A good alpha test sets well-defined benchmarks and measures a product against those benchmarks. About chaos, reality, and imagination. Beta tests explore the limits of a product by allowing customers to explore every element of the product in their native environments.
When it’s over
You have a decent idea of how a product performs and whether it meets the design criteria (and if it’s “beta-ready”) You have a good idea of what your customer thinks about the product and what s/he is likely to experience when they purchase it.
What happens next
Beta Test! Release Party!


Some additional points to consider:

  • Both terms (alpha and beta) are used primarily in the technology industry (software and hardware).
  • Most products include both alpha and beta test phases.
  • Both phases are excellent at discovering bugs.
  • Both phases often shift their goals and methods in real-time based on the on-going results.
  • Some companies use terms like field trials, prerelease, customer validation, CAT (customer acceptance testing), UAT (user acceptance testing), and beta testing synonymously.

Have any thoughts or questions about alpha vs. beta testing to share? Feel free to add them below!

Request a demo of the Centercode platform!

You Might Also Like

  • James McKey

    Great stuff! CAT is also often referred to UAT (User Acceptance Testing) and the term is mentioned in wikipedia for Beta testing a couple of times (though I don’t think there are specific citations):

    As you mention, there’s not really a ‘standard’. The IEEE would seem the place for this to be defined (e.g., but it gives me a headache digging through their standards 🙂 Plus, in my experience at least, it seems most software engineers resist being pigeon holed into strict policies/procedures, though many appreciate ‘best practices’ for advice.

  • Vidya

    Its very Helpful…

  • http://centercode jimmy

    thanks very help-full

  • Adnan TAYYAB

    Thnks this was vry helpful……!!!!!!!

  • cool

    Great explanation, clear and concise. Love it man

  • Kevin Gilles

    Detailed and precised, thanks for the explanation !

  • Delia König

    thank you. what do you think about white box testing. I prefer it to black box testing. I also like integration, system, and UA testing. Best Regards

  • Martha C

    Very good info! Thanks!

  • Hagai Luger

    Plain and simple explanation. Thanks!

  • Pingback: Kaypok()

  • Pingback: Design Notes #5: Moving Kaypok Briefly from Alpha to Beta | Kaypok Blog()

  • Pingback: How To Mix Dogfood Into Product Development - UXPin()

  • Pingback: Chapter 4: Strategies for Tapping the Groundswell summary | Matt's blog()

  • Mohammad Alhobayyeb

    In two lines,
    Alpha: more bugs, missing features,
    Beta: less bugs, complete features.

  • Armis Game

    Wow, I was searching for Alpha and Beta testing to know what to expect for PICISI development, your material is certainly the most comprehensive of them all. Thanks for the knowledge.

    That knowledge will be used as we develop, a crowdfunding site presently under construction.

  • Edgar Wilson

    Simple presentation and effective explanation. Thank you, just what I was looking for.

  • pedrovarela

    Excellent post, also go to the link of the white paper and other download kits they have, 100% recommended.

    Thanks for this information.

  • Munir Ahmad Tarar

    Very handy!

  • Marshmallow22 Desert

    thanks for the info!

  • Jeff Griffith

    Thank you! I feel you covered the basics very well, in fact you said it best here “While there are no hard and fast rules, and many companies have their own definitions and unique processes” The table is precise and informative too 🙂

  • Jezebelisgone

    Wow! What an excellent explanation! Couldn’t find a decent definition until I stumbled upon you. I now understand and am well informed. Thank you!